Protect Yourself and Report the Latest Frauds, Scams, Spams, Fakes, Identify Theft Hacks and Hoaxes
There are affiliate links on this page.
Read our disclosure policy to learn more.
Translate this page to any language by choosing a language in the box below.
Spoiler alert, Our opinion: It's Overpriced Dried Food Pellets with massively exaggerated health claims!
You may have seen an advertisement for "Balance of Nature" on tv, radio or in a newspaper or magazine? You may have thought that the commercial sounded like a scam and the claims seemed exaggerated and wondered why the government was allowing them to get away with it. In this case, there have been complaints to the FTC about the claims made in the advertising. Below is the text of the FTC's (Federal Trade Commission) warning letter to Balance of Nature's manufacturers.
Balance of Nature, Inc. represents that its dietary supplement provides the nutrition of over 10 servings of whole fruits and vegetables per day, enhances the immune system, and has numerous other health benefits. They rely almost exclusively on testimonials.
Balance of Nature does not explicitly claim to cure or treat any disease. Instead they use testimonials from people making claims - which are highly subjective and cannot be substantiated - like "Since taking Balance of Nature, I have more energy." Guess what? If you ate a cup of sugar every day, you'd "have more energy", but that does mean that is a good thing to do?
The phrase, "I feel like since taking Balance of Nature..."
followed by some absurd claim is heard over and over in their commercials, like:
And they frequently use deceptive attempts to present their (presumably PAID) testimonials are more credible than they are:
Really? How could ANY of the benefits in these claims be caused by eating capsules of freeze-dried fruit or vegetables?
Were any of these claims examined objectively? Was any of this measured, independently and objectively? We sure cannot find any such studies conducted by independent researchers at major universities. This is just people who already like the product promoting it. We assume they are paid for their testimonials. If you pay most people enough, they'll go on a commercial and say anything.
It would make as much sense to say "I feel like hitting myself in the head with a hammer makes my joint pain go away" or "Since I started eating fresh, natural dirt from the garden, I have more energy, my bowels are more regular and my dog is better behaved".
In their commercials, they claim they are making it easier to get the vital nutrients fruits and vegetables by freeze-drying the foods and compressing them into a capsule for you to swallow. If you ask us, they are asking you to swallow a lot more than that! Look at their own labels: there are no claims made to nutrients, vitamins, minerals; just calories and total carbohydrates. Hey, nothing is more "fresh and natural" than taking fruit and vegetables, freeze-drying them, grinding them into a powder then compressing them into a capsule for you to eat weeks or months later.
Any child could tell you it's better to eat a fresh apple, banana, orange, etc. And that's not hard to do. Fresh fruit are inexpensive and sold almost everywhere, even in gas stations!
Balance of Nature's "From the Beginning" says Dr. Howard researched
"which fruits and vegetables, when combined, were most effective in 1) Strengthening your Immune System, 2) Cell Protection, and 3) DNA Repair and Apoptosis. Finally in 1997, tireless hours of research culminated in a unique formulation or 31 fruits and vegetables."
OK, Doc Brown reviewed time travel and made a flux capacitor..No one independently reviewed that either. Humor intended for Back to the Future fans; but the point is, Balance of Nature makes "claims"... has anyone else, without a connection to the company reviewed those claims, scientifically and objectively?
Only Balance of Nature (or a court inquiry) can tell us that, but does it matter? There are plenty of self-deluded people who "believe" that wearing tin foil on their heads keeps the government from listening to their thoughts.
Even if we are to believe that these testimonials are truthful, there is NO evidence, ZERO objective, independently reviewed evidence provided, and none we can find, to prove that these claims are true and are not due to something else! For example, did these people start exercising and losing weight at the same time they started taking Balance of Nature? What other changes occurred in their diet, health or lives during this time? This is why independent studies are done, using a control group and carefully selecting the subjects to limit variables.
We have seen no evidence that this has been done. Just some very questionable "Russian studies". See this review.
Anyone who took an intro to psychology course in college is familiar with the placebo effect; simply put, an improvement of symptoms is observed, despite taking a sugar pill that has no active ingredients at all. due to the person's expectation that it will help. So, even if the people in the commercials are telling us what they believe, it may just be that, their expectation or belief, not objective truth.
Dietary supplements, like "Balance of Nature" are not reviewed or approved by the FDA. As a dietary supplement, the manufacturers do not need FDA approval prior to marketing the product. It is the company's responsibility to make sure its products are safe and that any claims are true. There are no government agencies testing or reviewing the product, nor did we find any independent labs or universities (who do not have a connection to the company) conducting any tests or reviews of Balance of Nature, nor validating the claims made in the commercials. The only accountability is if a consumer or other party chooses to take them to court in a lawsuit..
The National Advertising Division (NAD) had its own concerns over Balance of Nature's advertising claims and requested substantiation for the product's health claims, but did not receive any written response. Balance of Nature, Inc. declined to participate in the NAD's self-regulatory process, and so NAD referred the matter to the FTC for review in 2018. The FTC declined to investigate, but NOT because they did not feel the charges were valid, but rather because of "a number of factors related to resource allocation and enforcement priorities," etc. In other words, they had bigger fish to fry and this is just a dietary supplement.
On their commercials, they tell you it is basically freeze-dried fruit and vegetable supplement products. There is a separate bottle for fruits,
vegetables, a "Fiber and Spice dietary fiber supplement". The labeling required by law, tells you, in order from most to least, what's in it.
The Fruits capsules label says: Aloe Vera, Apple, Banana, Blueberry, Cherry, Cranberry, Grape, Grapefruit, Lemon, Mango, Orange, Papaya, Pineapple,
Raspberry, Strawberry, and Tomato.
The Veggies label says: Broccoli, Cabbage, Carrot, Cauliflower, Cayenne Pepper, Celery Stalk, Garlic, Kale,
Onion, Shiitake Mushroom, Soy Bean, Spinach, Wheat Grass, Yam, and Zucchini.
Balance of Nature also contains soybeans. Some people avoid soy since it is an estrogenic ingredient that can lead to health issues n some people. Soybeans are high in protein, but obviously there's not enough in a capsule (or even 10 capsules) to be significant on a daily basis)
The first thing that comes to our mind, is the "Three Stooges" (Moe Howard, Shemp Howard, Curly Howard, Larry Fine). Remember the hospital episode, where they posed as doctors in a hospital? "Paging Dr. Howard! Paging Dr. Fine. Dr. Howard". Humor aside,
The Balance of Nature Twitter account tells us:
"Dr. Howard earned his Doctor of Chiropractic degree at Cleveland Chiropractic College and had a very successful practice. He was invited to study medicine at Pavlov first Medical Institute in Saint Petersburg, Russia."
and
"Howard became Dean of Foreign Student affairs and finished his medical degree here. Dr. Howard has never practiced in the medical field and has never claimed to."
It is reported on other websites that Dr Douglas Howard (born 1960) earned his Doctor of Chiropractic degree at Cleveland Chiropractic College in 1986. He is reported on other websites and the Dr. Howard Biography website here to have a medical degree from Pavlov first Medical Institute in Saint Petersburg, Russia and studied homeopathy in Germany.
Balance of Nature is owned by Dr Douglas Howard, started in 1997. It is a privately owned and operated and based in St George, Utah. The company was started in 1997 by Dr Howard.
Balance of Nature is not accredited by the Better Business Bureau, but there are reviews on their website. Out of 96 reviews there, it had a rating of 3.9 out of 5.
Balance of Nature
PO Box 27740
Las Vegas, NV 89126-7740
Phone: (435) 688-7454.
In answer to a question online about whether the product is Organic, Balance of Nature did not answer the question, instead they said:
At Balance of Nature we do everything it takes to produce the very best product. No shortcuts. We go beyond the "USDA Organic" seal. Our products contain produce grown, handled, processed, and certified in a way that meets and exceeds the requirements for using the USDA Organic seal.
Hmm, exactly HOW does a product go "beyond the USDA Organic seal"? They don't say. That implies the product is NOT certified organic under the federal NOP program. Only foods and products that are certified organic under this program are allowed to label or market their products as organic in the United States.. Notice that the word organic does not appear anywhere on the label.
We rate this product a nonsensical waste of money, based on:
For all we can tell, Dr. Howard is a nice guy and intelligent. But so was Moe Howard. Dr. Howard's advice in his video is excellent, talking about taking accountability for your own health, fitness, emotional and spiritual health. That's good advice. But paying about $100 for a 30 day supply of freeze-dried food pills is simply insane. You are wasting your money and buying positively absurd hype.
Go buy a bag of apples, some bananas, peaches or eat a salad instead. You don't have to be a food scientist to know that unprocessed, fresh foods are always better for you than a manufactured freeze-dried pill. Eating these pills probably won't do you any harm, but their present prices, they sure will harm your wallet!
If you live in a desert and have loads of money (hmm, another Howard, Howard Hughes comes to mind), okay, buy the dried food pills..
And if you REALLY want to buy them, we won't stop you. In fact, You can click here and buy them and we will earn a small commission from the sale, so go right ahead and buy Balance of Nature!
We do not rate this product as an out-and-out scam; just over-hyped, overpriced dried food pills. Like those little green tablets we used to feed our pet rabbits and guinea pigs as children. And in our opinion, the testimonial claims are grossly exaggerated nonsense.
August 20, 2019
Ref: # HAF4W (DEN)-19-09-WL
Dear Mr. Howard:
On February 4 - 8, 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) inspected your facility located at 785 E. Venture Dr., St. George, UT. During the inspection, our investigator collected product labels and written material accompanying your products. In addition, we reviewed labeling on your firm's website at www.balanceofnature.com and your YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/user/balanceofnature1. The inspection and our review of your product labeling revealed serious violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) and applicable regulations. You can find the Act and its implementing regulations through links on FDA's home page at www.fda.gov.
We acknowledge receipt of your response to the FDA-483, Inspectional Observations, dated February 18, 2019, and we address your response below.
Unapproved New Drugs/ Misbranded Drugs
FDA reviewed your website at the Internet address www.balanceofnature.com and your YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/user/balanceofnature1 in July 2019 and has determined that you take orders on your website for your Whole Food Fruits, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fiber & Spice products. Your website links to your YouTube channel and your YouTube channel links back to your website. In addition, we reviewed the product labels and written material accompanying your shipments collected during the inspection. The claims on your product labeling, including your website and YouTube channel, establish that these products are drugs under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. - 321(g)(1)(B)] because they are intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. As explained further below, introducing or delivering these products for introduction into interstate commerce for such uses violates the Act.
Examples of some of the labeling claims that provide evidence that your products are intended for use as drugs include:
Whole Food Veggies capsules:
Whole Food Fiber & Spice:
Statements on the product label:
Whole Food Fruits, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fiber & Spice:
Your YouTube channel also contains additional evidence of intended use in the form of personal testimonials recommending or describing the use of the products for the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Examples of such testimonials include:
Your products are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced uses and, therefore, the products are "new drugs" under section 201(p) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without prior approval from FDA, as described in sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. -- 331(d), 355(a)]. FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data and information demonstrating that the drug is safe and effective.
A drug is misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 352(f)(1)] if the drug fails to bear adequate directions for its intended use(s). "Adequate directions for use" means directions under which a layperson can use a drug safely and for the purposes for which it is intended (21 CFR 201.5). Prescription drugs, as defined in section 503(b)(1)(A) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 353(b)(1)(A)], can only be used safely at the direction, and under the supervision, of a licensed practitioner.
Your products Whole Food Fruits, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fiber & Spice are intended for treatment of one or more diseases that are not amenable to self-diagnosis or treatment without the supervision of a licensed practitioner. Therefore, it is impossible to write adequate directions for a layperson to use your products safely for their intended purposes. Accordingly, your Whole Food Fruits, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fiber & Spice products fail to bear adequate directions for their intended use and, therefore, the products are misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 352(f)(1)]. The introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of these misbranded drugs violates section 301(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 331(a)].
Adulterated Dietary Supplements
Even if the labeling of your Whole Food Fiber & Spice, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fruits products did not have therapeutic claims that make them unapproved new drugs, the products would be adulterated within the meaning of section 402(g)(1) of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 342(g)(1)] because the products have been prepared, packed, or held under conditions that do not meet the Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) requirements for dietary supplements, Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 111 (21 CFR Part 111), as follows:
As a distributor that contracts with other manufacturers to manufacture, package, and label dietary supplements for distribution under your firm's name, your firm has an obligation to know what and how manufacturing, packaging, and/or labeling activities are performed so that you can make decisions related to whether your dietary supplement products conform to established specifications and whether to approve and release the products for distribution [72 Fed. Reg. 34752, 34790 (Jun. 25, 2007)]. Your firm introduces or delivers, or causes the introduction or delivery of, the dietary supplement into interstate commerce in its final form for distribution to consumers. As such, your firm has an overarching and ultimate responsibility to ensure that all phases of the production of that product are in compliance with dietary supplement CGMP requirements.
During the inspection, management stated that your firm distributes proprietary dietary supplement products under your brand names and that these dietary supplement products are manufactured for your firm by a contract manufacturer. Although a firm may contract out certain dietary supplement manufacturing operations, it cannot contract out its ultimate responsibility to ensure that the dietary supplement it places into commerce (or causes to be placed into commerce) is not adulterated for failure to comply with dietary supplement CGMP requirements. [See United States v. Dotterweich, 320 U.S. 277, 284 (1943) (explaining that an offense can be committed under the Act by anyone who has "a responsible share in the furtherance of the transaction which the statute outlaws"); United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658, 672 (1975) (holding that criminal liability under the Act does not turn on awareness of wrongdoing, and that "agents vested with the responsibility, and power commensurate with that responsibility, to devise whatever measures are necessary to ensure compliance with the Act" can be held accountable for violations of the Act)]. In particular, the Act prohibits a person from introducing or delivering for introduction, or causing the delivery or introduction, into interstate commerce a dietary supplement that is adulterated under section 402(g) for failure to comply with dietary supplement CGMP requirements (see 21 U.S.C. 342(g) and 331(a)).
Thus, a firm that contracts out some or all of its operations must establish a system of production and process controls to ensure the quality of the dietary supplement and that the dietary supplement is packaged and labeled as specified in the master manufacturing record (21 CFR 111.55). The quality control personnel must ensure that the manufacturing, packaging, labeling, and holding operations ensure the quality of the dietary supplement and that the dietary supplement is packaged and labeled as specified in the master manufacturing record (21 CFR 111.105).
We have reviewed your letter, dated February 18, 2018, which states that you are currently working on developing written quality control procedures. We are unable to evaluate the adequacy of your response because you did not provide any documentation of the quality control procedures.
We have reviewed your letter dated February 18, 2019, which states that you are currently working on procedures for how each complaint is reviewed and investigated. We are unable to evaluate the adequacy of your response because you did not provide any documentation of the product complaint procedures.
Once you have established the procedures required by 21 CFR 111.553 and 21 CFR 111.560, you must maintain written records of every complaint related to good manufacturing practice and records of the findings of any investigation and follow-up action when an investigation is performed, as required by 21 CFR 111.570(b)(2).
Misbranded Dietary Supplements
Even if your Whole Food Fruits, Whole Food Veggies, and Whole Food Fiber & Spice products were not unapproved new drugs, they would still be misbranded foods within the meaning of section 403 of the Act [21 U.S.C. - 343]. Specifically, our review of your product labels revealed that your products are misbranded within the meaning of section 403 of the Act as follows:
Under section 403(r)(1)(A) of the Act, a claim that characterizes the level of a nutrient which is of the type required to be in the labeling of the food must be made in accordance with a regulation authorizing the use of such a claim. Characterizing the level of a nutrient on the food labeling of a product without complying with the specific requirements pertaining to the nutrient content claim for that nutrient misbrands the product under section 403(r)(1)(A) of the Act.
Nutrient content claims using the term "antioxidant" must comply with, among other requirements, the requirements listed in 21 CFR 101.54(g). These requirements state, in part, that for a product to bear such a claim, a reference daily intake (RDI) must have been established for each of the nutrients that are the subject of the claim, as required by 21 CFR 101.54(g)(1), and these nutrients must have recognized antioxidant activity, as required by 21 CFR 101.54(g)(2). Such a claim must also include the names of the nutrients that are the subject of the claim as part of the claim or, alternatively, the term "antioxidant" or "antioxidants" may be linked by a symbol (e.g., an asterisk) that refers to the same symbol that appears elsewhere on the same panel of the product label, followed by the name or names of the nutrients with recognized antioxidant activity, as required by 21 CFR 101.54(g)(4). The above quoted antioxidant claim on your product labels is a nutrient content claim because it characterizes the level of antioxidants in your products, but they do not comply with 21 CFR 101.54(g)(4) because the label does not include the names of the nutrients that are the subject of the claim.
Additionally, the claim "More antioxidant power than any other brand" is a "relative claim." The claim fails to include the accompanying information for relative claims as required by 21 CFR 101.13(j). In order to bear a relative claim about the level of a nutrient, the amount of that nutrient in the food must be compared to an amount of nutrient in an appropriate reference food as specified under 21 CFR 101.13(j)(1) and the label or labeling must state the identity of the reference food under 21 CFR 101.13(j)(2).
Additionally, your Whole Food Veggies capsules product declares "yam" as part of the proprietary blend whereas the product's batch record for lot #20191401 (from (b)(4) inspection ending 2/8/2019) lists "wild yam." These are two different botanical ingredients - the label must state the common or usual name for the dietary ingredient used in the product.
The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive statement of violations that exist in connection with your products. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of the violations identified above and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations. It is your responsibility to ensure your firm complies with all requirements of federal law, including FDA regulations.
You should take prompt action to correct all the violations cited in this letter. Failure to promptly correct these violations may result in legal action without further notice, including, without limitation, seizure and injunction.
Within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken correct violations. Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation, such as photographs, corrective actions taken to date, or other useful information that would assist us in evaluating your corrections. If you do not believe that your products are in violation of the Act, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the corrections.
Further, Section 743 of the Act, 21 U.S.C. - 379j-31, authorizes FDA to assess and collect fees to cover FDA's costs for certain activities, including re-inspection-related costs. A re-inspection is one or more inspections conducted subsequent to an inspection that identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act, specifically to determine whether compliance has been achieved. Re-inspection-related costs mean all expenses, including administrative expenses, incurred in connection with FDA's arranging, conducting, and evaluating the results of the inspection and assessing and collecting the inspection fees, 21 U.S.C. - 379j-31(a)(2)(B). For a domestic facility, FDA will assess and collect fees for re-inspection-related costs from the responsible party for the domestic facility. The inspection noted in this letter identified noncompliance materially related to a food safety requirement of the Act. Accordingly, FDA may assess fees to cover any re-inspection-related costs.
Your reply should be addressed to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Attn: Nancy G. Schmidt, Compliance Officer; 6th Ave. and Kipling St., P.O. Box 25087, Denver, Colorado, 80225-0087. You may reach Ms. Schmidt at (303) 236-3046 if you have any questions about this matter.
Sincerely,
/S/
LaTonya M. Mitchell, PhD.
Denver District Director
Program Division Director
Office of Human and Animal Food Operations -
Division IV West
Copies of the documents mentioned in this news release are available from the FTC's Web site and from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click here or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,600 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.
Consumer Information: